Asset-based maintenance

Preventive and corrective work on the same asset history.

BoRo connects recurring plans, calendar, contracts, failures, technicians, parts, SLA, evidence, and indicators over a traceable installed base.

Where this sits

BoRo Studio is an operational architecture studio, and its current focus is Solar + BESS project delivery. This page covers an adjacent operational capability we understand and can implement. The problem is rarely that software is missing: it is how states move between functions, how decisions propagate, how work changes hands and which system owns which fact. What follows is a lifecycle, not a feature list.

Discuss an operational constraint
Operating lifecycle
Contract
Asset
Calendar
Preventive
Corrective
Technician
Part
Evidence
KPI
Invoice

History that is useful

Each asset accumulates visits, failures, spare parts, reports, photos, and decisions. The next intervention starts with context.

  • Installed base by customer or location
  • Technical history by asset
  • Recurring failures and corrective work
  • Documents and evidence attached

Planning and SLA

Recurring preventive work and emergency corrective work use different rules, but they should live in the same operation.

  • Maintenance calendar
  • Contracts and coverage
  • SLA alerts
  • Compliance and backlog indicators

For operations with

  • Recurring maintenance contracts.
  • Installed assets at enterprise customers.
  • Emergency and priority corrective work.
  • Spare parts, reports, and administrative close.
FAQ
Can preventive and corrective work coexist?

Yes. They share customer, asset, and history, but can have different rules for calendar, SLA, approval, and billing.

Is history kept by asset?

Yes. The goal is to see visits, failures, parts, evidence, and reports attached to each asset or installation.

Can it feed indicators?

Yes. Preventive compliance, urgent corrective work, pending parts, close times, and billing readiness are examples.

Discuss an operational constraint