Operational architecture for complex project delivery
BoRo designs how complex project-delivery companies should operate, then implements the systems required to make that model work.
Current focusSolar + BESS project deliveryFor growth-stage EPC and developer-EPC organizations where engineering, procurement, construction and commissioning have become harder to coordinate as project volume grows.- EngineeringChange issued
- ProcurementOrder not yet revisedHuman middlewareSomeone remembers to tell procurement. Usually.
- Project controlsForecast still on old scope
- ConstructionBuilding to superseded drawing
- CommissioningTest plan unaware
A change approved in engineering has to reach four other functions. Where no handoff is defined, a person carries it.
Your teams may be good. Your software may be good. The architecture between them can still fail.
A delivery organization that feels harder to run with every project added is rarely short of talent or short of software. It is short of an agreed architecture between the two. Three patterns come up again and again.
- 01
Human Middleware
Experienced people become the integration layer between teams, systems and decisions. The operation runs on what they remember to carry across.
- 02
Coordination Latency
A change is approved, but different parts of the operation begin acting on the new reality at different times.
- 03
Fragmented Operational State
Each function holds part of the truth, and nobody owns the complete operational lifecycle.
Architecture before implementation.
Four stages. The third one only happens if the second one says it should.
- 01
Diagnose
Trace how work, decisions and information actually move, not how the process documents say they move.
- 02
Architect
Define lifecycle states, ownership, decision rights, handoffs, exceptions and system boundaries.
- 03
Implement
Configure, connect, extend or build only what the operating architecture requires.
- 04
Operate and improve
Measure how the operating model performs and keep changing it as the operation changes.
Architecture Sprint
Ten business days to understand where the operating model is breaking and determine what, if anything, should be implemented.
- Current-state operating architecture, lifecycle states and decision rights
- System-of-record boundaries and change propagation
- A prioritized roadmap and an executive decision readout
It can conclude that your current systems are sufficient. That is a real outcome, and we deliver it.
Project delivery first. The same pattern elsewhere.
Operational architecture is the category. The operations we concentrate on are growth-stage Solar + BESS project delivery companies, where experienced people have become the integration layer between engineering, procurement and construction.
Solar + BESS Project Delivery
Growth-stage EPCs, developer-EPCs and integrated project-delivery companies running several projects at once, where a change in one function has to reach every other one before anyone buys or builds the wrong thing.
Operational architecture for Solar + BESS project delivery- Engineering coordination
- Procurement
- Project controls
- Construction execution
- Commissioning
- Cross-functional change propagation
Distributed operations
Operations where the lifecycle of a single job crosses several teams, systems and locations before it can be closed.
Coordinating: Customers · Dispatch · Field teams · Assets · Parts · Closeout
Operational systems
Businesses where project, field, commercial and back-office functions have to operate from the same operational reality, and currently do not.
Coordinating: Project · Field · Commercial · Back office
Solar + BESS project delivery is BoRo's current commercial focus, not a claim of exclusivity or of a track record in the sector. Operational architecture is the category; the focus is where we apply it first.
Start with the constraint, not the software
Tell us what is breaking in the operation. If the answer is that you do not need to build anything, we will say so.
Discuss an operational constraint